SuiteCRM up to 7.15.2/8.10.2 DetailUserRole record improper authorization
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | $0-$5k | 2.03 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in SuiteCRM up to 7.15.2/8.10.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component DetailUserRole. The manipulation of the argument record leads to improper authorization. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2026-108712. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in SuiteCRM up to 7.15.2/8.10.2. This issue affects some unknown functionality of the component DetailUserRole. The manipulation of the argument record with an unknown input leads to a improper authorization vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-285. The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
SuiteCRM through 7.15.2 and 8.10.2 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the DetailUserRole entry point that allows authenticated non-admin users to view other users' ACL data. Attackers can supply another non-admin user's id in the record parameter to read that user's assigned roles and per-module ACL action matrix.
The advisory is shared at hackmd.io. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-108712 since 10/11/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 10/11/2026). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1548.002 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.3
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper authorizationCWE: CWE-285 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
10/11/2026 Advisory disclosed10/11/2026 CVE reserved
10/11/2026 VulDB entry created
10/11/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: hackmd.ioStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-108712 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-108712
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-416621
Entry
Created: 10/11/2026 14:51Changes: 10/11/2026 14:51 (73)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.