| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Topper TopperMod 2.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. Performing a manipulation of the argument localita results in sql injection. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2008-1554. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Topper TopperMod 2.0. It has been classified as critical. This affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument localita with an unknown input leads to a sql injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-89. The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
SQL injection vulnerability in account/index.php in TopperMod 2.0, when magic_quotes_gpc is disabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via a non-alphanumeric first character the localita parameter, which bypasses a protection mechanism.
The weakness was disclosed 03/31/2008 by __GiReX__ (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2008-1554 since 03/31/2008. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details and a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1505 for this issue.
The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as highly functional.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (41441), Exploit-DB (5311) and SecurityFocus (BID 28447†). The entry VDB-41756 is pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Sql injectionCWE: CWE-89 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Highly functional
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/25/2008 🔍03/31/2008 🔍
03/31/2008 🔍
03/31/2008 🔍
03/16/2015 🔍
10/20/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: __GiReX__
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2008-1554 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2008-1554
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-41757
X-Force: 41441 - TopperMod mod.php SQL injection
SecurityFocus: 28447
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/16/2015 17:00Updated: 10/20/2024 08:07
Changes: 03/16/2015 17:00 (50), 09/22/2018 08:49 (8), 10/20/2024 08:07 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.