Computer Associates Desktop Management Suite up to 11.2 memory corruption

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
9.0$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Computer Associates Desktop Management Suite up to 11.2. The affected element is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2008-1328. There is not any exploit available. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Computer Associates Desktop Management Suite up to 11.2. This issue affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Buffer overflow in the LGServer service in CA ARCserve Backup for Laptops and Desktops r11.0 through r11.5, and Suite 11.1 and 11.2, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified "command arguments."

The bug was discovered 04/03/2008. The weakness was released 04/07/2008 by Dyon Balding with Secunia Research (Website). The advisory is shared at support.ca.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2008-1328 since 03/13/2008. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.

It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 69317 (CA ARCserve Backup for Laptops and Desktops Server and CA Desktop Management Suite Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Windows and running in the context l.

Applying a patch is able to eliminate this problem. A possible mitigation has been published even before and not after the disclosure of the vulnerability. Furthermore it is possible to detect and prevent this kind of attack with TippingPoint and the filter 11915.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (41641), Tenable (69317), SecurityFocus (BID 28616†), OSVDB (44320†) and SecurityTracker (ID 1019788†). Entries connected to this vulnerability are available at VDB-3112, VDB-39039, VDB-39038 and VDB-39037. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.0

VulDB Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Temp Score: 9.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Memory corruption
CWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 69317
Nessus Name: CA ARCserve Backup for Laptops and Desktops Server and CA Desktop Management Suite Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍

Saint ID: exploit_info/brightstor_arcserve_lgserver2
Saint Name: CA ARCserve Backup for Laptops and Desktops LGServer service code execution

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Patch
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍
TippingPoint: 🔍

McAfee IPS: 🔍
McAfee IPS Version: 🔍

ISS Proventia IPS: 🔍
PaloAlto IPS: 🔍

Timelineinfo

03/13/2008 🔍
04/03/2008 +21 days 🔍
04/03/2008 +0 days 🔍
04/04/2008 +1 days 🔍
04/04/2008 +0 days 🔍
04/07/2008 +3 days 🔍
04/07/2008 +0 days 🔍
04/07/2008 +0 days 🔍
04/13/2008 +6 days 🔍
08/13/2013 +1948 days 🔍
03/16/2015 +580 days 🔍
08/08/2019 +1606 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: support.ca.com
Researcher: Dyon Balding
Organization: Secunia Research
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2008-1328 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2008-1328
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-41861

IAVM: 🔍

X-Force: 41641
SecurityFocus: 28616 - Computer Associates ARCserve Backup for Laptops and Desktops Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities
OSVDB: 44320 - CA ARCserve Backup for Laptops and Desktops Server LGServer service buffer overflow
SecurityTracker: 1019788
Vulnerability Center: 18156 - CA ARCserve Backup for Laptops and Desktops LGServer Service Allows Remote Code Execution, Critical
Vupen: ADV-2008-1104

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/16/2015 17:00
Updated: 08/08/2019 12:09
Changes: 03/16/2015 17:00 (76), 08/08/2019 12:09 (12)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:247:103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Might our Artificial Intelligence support you?

Check our Alexa App!