IBM solidDB 06.00.1018 Logging logging format string

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
6.9$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in IBM solidDB 06.00.1018. This affects the function logging of the component Logging. The manipulation leads to format string. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2008-1705. Furthermore, an exploit is available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in IBM solidDB 06.00.1018. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function logging of the component Logging. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a format string vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-134. The product uses a function that accepts a format string as an argument, but the format string originates from an external source. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Format string vulnerability in the logging function in IBM solidDB 06.00.1018 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the (1) user name, (2) peer name, and possibly unspecified other fields.

The weakness was published 04/09/2008 by Luigi Auriemma (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2008-1705 since 04/09/2008. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known.

The exploit is available at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. We expect the 0-day to have been worth approximately $25k-$100k.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product. Furthermore it is possible to detect and prevent this kind of attack with TippingPoint and the filter 8802.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (41485), SecurityFocus (BID 28468†), Secunia (SA29512†), SecurityTracker (ID 1019721†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-40866†). Similar entries are available at VDB-41888, VDB-41887 and VDB-41886. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.9

VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Format string
CWE: CWE-134 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍
TippingPoint: 🔍

McAfee IPS: 🔍
McAfee IPS Version: 🔍

ISS Proventia IPS: 🔍
Fortigate IPS: 🔍

Timelineinfo

03/26/2008 🔍
03/26/2008 +0 days 🔍
03/27/2008 +1 days 🔍
03/27/2008 +0 days 🔍
04/09/2008 +13 days 🔍
04/09/2008 +0 days 🔍
04/09/2008 +0 days 🔍
08/07/2013 +1946 days 🔍
03/16/2015 +586 days 🔍
05/07/2017 +783 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: ibm.com

Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔
Researcher: Luigi Auriemma
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2008-1705 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2008-1705
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-41885
X-Force: 41485
SecurityFocus: 28468 - IBM solidDB Format String Vulnerability and Multiple Denial of Service Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 29512 - IBM solidDB Multiple Vulnerabilities, Moderately Critical
SecurityTracker: 1019721 - IBM solidDB Format String and Memory Errors Let Remote Users Execute Arbitrary Code or Deny Service
Vulnerability Center: 40866 - IBM SolidDB 06.00.1018 and Earlier Logging Function Format String Vulnerability, Medium
Vupen: ADV-2008-1038

scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/16/2015 17:00
Updated: 05/07/2017 17:28
Changes: 03/16/2015 17:00 (62), 05/07/2017 17:28 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!