ONLYOFFICE DocumentServer up to 9.x Request Filtering Agent server-side request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.6 | $0-$5k | 2.47+ |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in ONLYOFFICE DocumentServer up to 9.x and classified as problematic. This impacts an unknown function of the component Request Filtering Agent. Performing a manipulation results in server-side request forgery. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-110652. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. The affected component should be upgraded.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in ONLYOFFICE DocumentServer up to 9.x. This affects an unknown part of the component Request Filtering Agent. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
ONLYOFFICE DocumentServer before 10.0.0 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /downloadfile/:docid endpoint that allows remote attackers to bypass the private-IP request-filtering-agent by exploiting the isInJwtToken flag when JWT verification is disabled in the default configuration. Attackers can submit a crafted request body containing an internal or loopback URL, which is treated as a DIRECT request skipping private-address filtering, causing the server to fetch and proxy back arbitrary private-network and cloud metadata content.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-110652 since 10/14/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.
Upgrading to version 10.0.0 eliminates this vulnerability.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.6
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 4.0
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Server-side request forgeryCWE: CWE-918
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: DocumentServer 10.0.0
Timeline
10/14/2026 Advisory disclosed10/14/2026 CVE reserved
10/14/2026 VulDB entry created
10/14/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-110652 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-110652
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-419835
Entry
Created: 10/14/2026 15:32Changes: 10/14/2026 15:32 (76)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.