InvoiceShelf up to 2.3.x Invoice Creation getInvoicePayload total/sub_total/tax/discount_val/due_amount input validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in InvoiceShelf up to 2.3.x. The affected element is the function InvoicesRequest::getInvoicePayload of the component Invoice Creation. Such manipulation of the argument total/sub_total/tax/discount_val/due_amount leads to input validation.
This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2026-55384. The attack may be performed from remote. There is no available exploit.
You should upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in InvoiceShelf up to 2.3.x. Affected by this issue is the function InvoicesRequest::getInvoicePayload of the component Invoice Creation. The manipulation of the argument total/sub_total/tax/discount_val/due_amount with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. Impacted is integrity. CVE summarizes:
InvoiceShelf is an open-source web & mobile app that helps track expenses, payments and create professional invoices and estimates. Prior to version 2.4.0, InvoiceShelf invoice, estimate, and recurring-invoice creation paths accept client-supplied total, sub_total, tax, discount_val, and due_amount values without verifying that they match the submitted line items. An authenticated user can persist manipulated financial totals through InvoicesRequest::getInvoicePayload and the corresponding EstimatesRequest and RecurringInvoiceRequest handlers, causing stored document totals to disagree with their item prices and quantities. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.
The advisory is available at github.com. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2026-55384 since 06/16/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be launched remotely. Technical details are known, but there is no available exploit.
Upgrading to version 2.4.0 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: InvoiceShelf 2.4.0
Timeline
06/16/2026 CVE reserved10/14/2026 Advisory disclosed
10/14/2026 VulDB entry created
10/14/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-55384 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-55384
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-420338
Entry
Created: 10/14/2026 21:38Changes: 10/14/2026 21:38 (68)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.