AtalayaLabs OxiCloud up to 0.9.3 /api/files/{id} improper authorization
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in AtalayaLabs OxiCloud up to 0.9.3. It has been rated as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /api/files/{id}. This manipulation causes improper authorization. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2026-111332. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in AtalayaLabs OxiCloud up to 0.9.3. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the file /api/files/{id}. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper authorization vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-285. The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
OxiCloud 0.9.1 through 0.9.3 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability that allows anonymous visitors to keep share access after password protection is added. Attackers holding an existing oxi_shares share-ring cookie can request content via GET /api/files/{id} to read shared files or folder contents despite the new password.
The advisory is shared at hackmd.io. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-111332 since 10/15/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 10/16/2026). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1548.002 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.5
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 3.7
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper authorizationCWE: CWE-285 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
10/15/2026 CVE reserved10/15/2026 VulDB entry created
10/16/2026 Advisory disclosed
10/16/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: hackmd.ioStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-111332 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-111332
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-420973
Entry
Created: 10/16/2026 00:27Changes: 10/16/2026 00:27 (74)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.