TiBillet Lespass up to 10e87909c5d526dffa6d424c104fc12860740537 APIv1 ApiBillet/serializers.py get_img_from_url img_url/image_url server-side request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | $0-$5k | 2.07 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in TiBillet Lespass up to 10e87909c5d526dffa6d424c104fc12860740537. This issue affects the function get_img_from_url of the file ApiBillet/serializers.py of the component APIv1. The manipulation of the argument img_url/image_url leads to server-side request forgery.
This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2026-112358. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
The vendor confirms: "[T]he fix (destination IP validation, redirect re-checks, timeout and size limit on remote image download) is already planned in our v2 API, which replaces the affected v1 endpoints. The v1 API, including the three affected serializers, will be removed in our next major release."
Details
A vulnerability was found in TiBillet Lespass up to 10e87909c5d526dffa6d424c104fc12860740537 and classified as problematic. This issue affects the function get_img_from_url of the file ApiBillet/serializers.py of the component APIv1. The manipulation of the argument img_url/image_url with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-112358. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The attack may be initiated remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are necessary for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 10/19/2026).
The vendor confirms: "[T]he fix (destination IP validation, redirect re-checks, timeout and size limit on remote image download) is already planned in our v2 API, which replaces the affected v1 endpoints. The v1 API, including the three affected serializers, will be removed in our next major release."
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.1
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Server-side request forgeryCWE: CWE-918
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
10/19/2026 Advisory disclosed10/19/2026 VulDB entry created
10/19/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Status: ConfirmedCVE: CVE-2026-112358 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-112358
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-422393
Entry
Created: 10/19/2026 16:50Changes: 10/19/2026 16:50 (53)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: Plus0ne_27
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #986821: TiBillet Cooperative Lespass (Django/DRF cooperative back-office and ticketing platform) commit 56c1865 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — CWE-918 (by Plus0ne_27)
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.