| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability described as problematic has been identified in Eejj33 BlackBook 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file footer.php. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability was named CVE-2008-2188. The attack may be performed from remote. In addition, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Eejj33 BlackBook 1.0. Affected is an unknown code block of the file footer.php. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. CVE summarizes:
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in EJ3 BlackBook 1.0 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) bookCopyright and (2) ver parameters to (a) footer.php, and the (3) bookName, (4) bookMetaTags, and (5) estiloCSS parameters to (b) header.php.
The weakness was presented 05/13/2008 (Website). The advisory is shared for download at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2008-2188 since 05/13/2008. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. Successful exploitation requires user interaction by the victim. Technical details and a public exploit are known. The MITRE ATT&CK project declares the attack technique as T1059.007.
The exploit is shared for download at securityfocus.com. It is declared as highly functional. By approaching the search of inurl:footer.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (42147), Exploit-DB (31721) and SecurityFocus (BID 29015†). Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Highly functional
Download: 🔍
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/02/2008 🔍05/13/2008 🔍
05/13/2008 🔍
05/13/2008 🔍
03/16/2015 🔍
06/08/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2008-2188 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2008-2188
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-42348
X-Force: 42147 - BlackBook multiple cross-site scripting
SecurityFocus: 29015 - BlackBook Multiple Cross Site Scripting Vulnerabilities
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 03/16/2015 17:00Updated: 06/08/2025 17:06
Changes: 03/16/2015 17:00 (55), 09/24/2018 09:02 (1), 06/08/2025 17:06 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:F64:103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.