No-IP Dynamic Update Client 2.2.1 Registry information disclosure
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in No-IP Dynamic Update Client 2.2.1. Affected is an unknown function of the component Registry. This manipulation causes information disclosure. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2008-2747. Additionally, an exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in No-IP Dynamic Update Client 2.2.1. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown processing of the component Registry. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
No-IP Dynamic Update Client (DUC) 2.2.1 on Windows uses weak permissions for the HKLM\SOFTWARE\Vitalwerks\DUC registry key, which allows local users to obtain obfuscated passwords and other sensitive information by reading the (1) TrayPassword, (2) Username, (3) Password, and (4) Hosts registry values.
The weakness was released 06/18/2008 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2008-2747 since 06/18/2008. The exploitation appears to be easy. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1592 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
It is possible to download the exploit at securityfocus.com. It is declared as highly functional.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (43298), SecurityFocus (BID 29758†) and Secunia (SA30714†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Base Score: 4.0
VulDB Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Information disclosureCWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Highly functional
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/16/2008 🔍06/18/2008 🔍
06/18/2008 🔍
06/18/2008 🔍
03/16/2015 🔍
11/16/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2008-2747 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2008-2747
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-42811
X-Force: 43298 - No-IP DUC (Dynamic DNS Update Client) DUC information disclosure
SecurityFocus: 29758 - No-IP DUC Client for Windows Local Information Disclosure Vulnerability
Secunia: 30714
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 03/16/2015 17:00Updated: 11/16/2017 11:11
Changes: 03/16/2015 17:00 (56), 11/16/2017 11:11 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.