Chainlit 2.12.0 MCP URL Validation validate_mcp_url server-side request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | $0-$5k | 0.86- |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Chainlit 2.12.0. This impacts the function validate_mcp_url of the component MCP URL Validation. Performing a manipulation results in server-side request forgery. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2026-120492. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Chainlit 2.12.0. This affects the function validate_mcp_url of the component MCP URL Validation. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Chainlit 2.12.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass path-scoped MCP allowed_urls entries because validate_mcp_url does not reject the semicolon character. Attackers can submit MCP URLs with '..;' segments to the /mcp endpoint, causing requests to paths outside the operator's grant on origins that strip semicolon path parameters.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-120492 since 11/02/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 11/02/2026).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
Support
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 5.4
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Server-side request forgeryCWE: CWE-918
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
11/02/2026 Advisory disclosed11/02/2026 CVE reserved
11/02/2026 VulDB entry created
11/02/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Not defined
CNA: VulnCheck
CVE: CVE-2026-120492 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-120492
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-429867
Entry
Created: 11/02/2026 15:53Changes: 11/02/2026 15:53 (75)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.