SourceHut meta.sr.ht up to 0.88.x RegisterAccount authorization
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | $0-$5k | 1.85 |
Summary
A vulnerability described as problematic has been identified in SourceHut meta.sr.ht up to 0.88.x. This impacts the function RegisterAccount. The manipulation results in authorization.
This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-121728. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. No exploit is available.
Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability was found in SourceHut meta.sr.ht up to 0.88.x. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is the function RegisterAccount. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a authorization vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-639. The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. This is going to have an impact on integrity. CVE summarizes:
SourceHut meta.sr.ht 0.56.11 before 0.89.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to register accounts when public registration is disabled. Attackers can obtain a CSRF token from /login and POST credentials to /register/step2, which invokes the unchecked GraphQL RegisterAccount mutation to create accounts.
The advisory is available at git.sr.ht. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-121728 since 11/03/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but there is no available exploit.
Upgrading to version 0.89.0 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 0.1
- 0.2
- 0.3
- 0.4
- 0.5
- 0.6
- 0.7
- 0.8
- 0.9
- 0.10
- 0.11
- 0.12
- 0.13
- 0.14
- 0.15
- 0.16
- 0.17
- 0.18
- 0.19
- 0.20
- 0.21
- 0.22
- 0.23
- 0.24
- 0.25
- 0.26
- 0.27
- 0.28
- 0.29
- 0.30
- 0.31
- 0.32
- 0.33
- 0.34
- 0.35
- 0.36
- 0.37
- 0.38
- 0.39
- 0.40
- 0.41
- 0.42
- 0.43
- 0.44
- 0.45
- 0.46
- 0.47
- 0.48
- 0.49
- 0.50
- 0.51
- 0.52
- 0.53
- 0.54
- 0.55
- 0.56
- 0.57
- 0.58
- 0.59
- 0.60
- 0.61
- 0.62
- 0.63
- 0.64
- 0.65
- 0.66
- 0.67
- 0.68
- 0.69
- 0.70
- 0.71
- 0.72
- 0.73
- 0.74
- 0.75
- 0.76
- 0.77
- 0.78
- 0.79
- 0.80
- 0.81
- 0.82
- 0.83
- 0.84
- 0.85
- 0.86
- 0.87
- 0.88
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 5.3
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: AuthorizationCWE: CWE-639 / CWE-285 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: meta.sr.ht 0.89.0
Timeline
11/03/2026 CVE reserved11/03/2026 VulDB entry created
11/04/2026 Advisory disclosed
11/04/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: git.sr.htStatus: Confirmed
CNA: VulnCheck
CVE: CVE-2026-121728 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-121728
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-430890
Entry
Created: 11/04/2026 00:21Changes: 11/04/2026 00:21 (77)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.