oss-apps SplitPro up to 2.1.6 expense.getExpenseDetails expenseId authorization
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00+ |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in oss-apps SplitPro up to 2.1.6. Impacted is the function expense.getExpenseDetails. This manipulation of the argument expenseId causes authorization.
This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2026-122324. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in oss-apps SplitPro up to 2.1.6 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function expense.getExpenseDetails. The manipulation of the argument expenseId with an unknown input leads to a authorization vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-639. The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
SplitPro through 2.1.6 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated users to read other users' expenses by supplying arbitrary expenseId values to expense.getExpenseDetails. Attackers who obtain an expense UUID, such as removed former participants, can retrieve expense notes, recurrence schedules, and full user rows of participants and group members.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-122324 since 11/05/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 11/05/2026).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.7
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 3.1
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: AuthorizationCWE: CWE-639 / CWE-285 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
11/05/2026 Advisory disclosed11/05/2026 CVE reserved
11/05/2026 VulDB entry created
11/05/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CNA: VulnCheck
CVE: CVE-2026-122324 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-122324
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-431491
Entry
Created: 11/05/2026 16:31Changes: 11/05/2026 16:31 (75)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.