miniOrange OAuth Single Sign On SSO Plugin up to 7.1.3 on WordPress privileges management
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.5 | $0-$5k | 1.33+ |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in miniOrange OAuth Single Sign On SSO Plugin up to 7.1.3. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. This manipulation causes privileges management. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2026-120844. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in miniOrange OAuth Single Sign On SSO Plugin up to 7.1.3. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a privileges management vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in miniOrange OAuth Single Sign On – SSO (OAuth Client) miniorange-login-with-eve-online-google-facebook allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects OAuth Single Sign On – SSO (OAuth Client): from n/a through 7.1.3.
The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-120844 since 11/03/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 11/06/2026). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.5
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 9.8
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
11/03/2026 CVE reserved11/06/2026 Advisory disclosed
11/06/2026 VulDB entry created
11/06/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comStatus: Not defined
CNA: Patchstack
CVE: CVE-2026-120844 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-120844
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-431773
Entry
Created: 11/06/2026 09:35Changes: 11/06/2026 09:35 (62)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.