Drupal 5/6 cross-site request forgery

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
6.0$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in Drupal 5/6. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability was named CVE-2008-3220. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Drupal 5/6 (Content Management System). This affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal 5.x before 5.8 and 6.x before 6.3 allows remote attackers to perform administrative actions via vectors involving deletion of "translated strings."

The weakness was presented 07/18/2008 by Heine Deelstra with Drupal Security Team (Website). The advisory is shared at drupal.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2008-3220 since 07/18/2008. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.

It is declared as highly functional. The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 33518 (Fedora 8 : drupal-5.8-1.fc8 (2008-6411)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Fedora Local Security Checks and running in the context l.

Upgrading to version 5 eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published even before and not after the disclosure of the vulnerability.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (43702), Tenable (33518), SecurityFocus (BID 30168†) and Secunia (SA31079†). See VDB-43296, VDB-43295, VDB-43294 and VDB-43292 for similar entries. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0

VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Cross-site request forgery
CWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Highly functional

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 33518
Nessus Name: Fedora 8 : drupal-5.8-1.fc8 (2008-6411)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍

OpenVAS ID: 860036
OpenVAS Name: Family Connections argv[1] Parameter Remote Arbitrary Command Execution Vulnerability
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Upgrade: Drupal 5

Timelineinfo

07/09/2008 🔍
07/15/2008 +5 days 🔍
07/15/2008 +0 days 🔍
07/16/2008 +0 days 🔍
07/18/2008 +2 days 🔍
07/18/2008 +0 days 🔍
07/18/2008 +0 days 🔍
03/17/2015 +2433 days 🔍
09/30/2018 +1293 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Product: drupal.org

Advisory: drupal.org
Researcher: Heine Deelstra
Organization: Drupal Security Team
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2008-3220 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2008-3220
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-43293
X-Force: 43702 - OpenID module for Drupal translation strings cross-site request forgery
SecurityFocus: 30168 - Drupal Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 31079 - Fedora update for drupal, Moderately Critical

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/17/2015 12:19
Updated: 09/30/2018 09:03
Changes: 03/17/2015 12:19 (67), 09/30/2018 09:03 (7)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Do you want to use VulDB in your project?

Use the official API to access entries easily!