OpenSSL up to 3.0.23/3.5.9/4.0.3/4.1.0 CMS_encrypt/CMS_encrypt_ex infinite loop

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
4.1$0-$5k0.00+

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability has been found in OpenSSL up to 3.0.23/3.5.9/4.0.3/4.1.0 and classified as problematic. This impacts the function CMS_encrypt/CMS_encrypt_ex. The manipulation leads to infinite loop. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2026-107496. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit. The affected component should be upgraded.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in OpenSSL up to 3.0.23/3.5.9/4.0.3/4.1.0 and classified as problematic. This issue affects the function CMS_encrypt/CMS_encrypt_ex. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a infinite loop vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-835. The product contains an iteration or loop with an exit condition that cannot be reached, i.e., an infinite loop. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:

Issue summary: Encrypting a CMS message to an EC certificate whose group order is 1 may cause CMS_encrypt() or CMS_encrypt_ex() to loop indefinitely. Impact summary: An attacker able to supply the recipient certificate to an application performing CMS encryption can cause that application to loop indefinitely, consuming CPU and resulting in Denial of Service. CWE: CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') Description: CMS_encrypt() and CMS_encrypt_ex() encrypt a message to one or more recipient certificates and, for an EC recipient, generate an ephemeral key in the recipient's group. If the certificate declares a group order of 1, random scalar generation can only produce zero. The key generation routine then retries without limit while waiting for a nonzero private scalar, so the call never returns. The OpenSSL TLS and QUIC implementations do not use this path. An application is exposed only if it calls CMS_encrypt() or CMS_encrypt_ex() with a recipient certificate whose EC parameters are attacker-controlled. Certificates with normal EC group orders do not trigger the loop. OpenSSL 4.0 and later reject unknown explicit EC groups in default builds. These versions are affected only when configured with the enable-ec_explicit_curves option. The result is a hang that consumes a CPU core until the process is interrupted, a Denial of Service. The severity is Low because the attacker must supply the recipient certificate and the application must choose to encrypt to it; ordinary CMS encryption to trusted recipients is unaffected. The fix makes EC key generation fail when the group has no valid nonzero private scalar, instead of retrying indefinitely. FIPS impact: no The FIPS modules in 4.1, 4.0, 3.5 and 3.0 are not affected. The FIPS provider does not support arbitrary explicit EC domain parameters, so an order-1 group is rejected during key import before the vulnerable key generation path is reached.

It is possible to read the advisory at openssl-library.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-107496 since 10/08/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 11/10/2026). The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1499 according to MITRE ATT&CK.

Upgrading to version 1.0.2zt, 1.1.1zk, 3.0.24, 3.5.10, 4.0.4 or 4.1.1 eliminates this vulnerability.

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Type

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1

VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Infinite loop
CWE: CWE-835 / CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔒

Upgrade: OpenSSL 1.0.2zt/1.1.1zk/3.0.24/3.5.10/4.0.4/4.1.1

Timelineinfo

10/08/2026 CVE reserved
11/10/2026 +33 days Advisory disclosed
11/10/2026 +0 days VulDB entry created
11/10/2026 +0 days VulDB entry last update

Sourcesinfo

Product: openssl.org

Advisory: openssl-library.org
Status: Confirmed

CNA: openssl
CVE: CVE-2026-107496 (🔒)

GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-107496
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-434003

Entryinfo

Created: 11/10/2026 19:29
Changes: 11/10/2026 19:29 (54)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Do you want to use VulDB in your project?

Use the official API to access entries easily!