Revive Adserver up to 6.0.8 Date Selection Controls period_preset cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00+ |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Revive Adserver up to 6.0.8. It has been classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Date Selection Controls. Performing a manipulation of the argument period_preset results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2026-108561. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Revive Adserver up to 6.0.8. This affects an unknown code block of the component Date Selection Controls. The manipulation of the argument period_preset with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
A stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the report date-selection controls of Revive Adserver 6.0.8 and earlier allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute JavaScript in a victim's browser by persuading them to follow a crafted report URL and complete normal reauthentication. An attacker-controlled period_preset value can be saved in the victim's session and inserted into JavaScript without appropriate encoding. The payload can execute on the initial report view and subsequent report views using the stored defaults. The issue is fixed in Revive Adserver 6.0.9 by applying JSON encoding appropriate for the JavaScript context to date-selection values.
The advisory is shared at hackerone.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-108561 since 10/10/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 6.0.9 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.7
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.1
CNA Vector (hackerone): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: Adserver 6.0.9
Timeline
10/10/2026 CVE reserved11/11/2026 Advisory disclosed
11/11/2026 VulDB entry created
11/11/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: hackerone.comStatus: Confirmed
CNA: hackerone
CVE: CVE-2026-108561 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-108561
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-435909
Entry
Created: 11/11/2026 19:08Changes: 11/11/2026 19:08 (65)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.