| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Sun J2me. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to access control. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2008-3553. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Sun J2me (version now known). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a access control vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-264. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Nokia Series 40 3rd edition devices allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, probably related to MIDP privilege escalation and persistent MIDlets, aka "ISSUES 3-10." NOTE: as of 20080807, the only disclosure is a vague pre-advisory with no actionable information. However, because it is from a company led by a well-known researcher, it is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes.
The weakness was published 08/08/2008 with Security Explorations (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at securityfocus.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2008-3553 since 08/08/2008. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 11/24/2017). It is expected to see the exploit prices for this product decreasing in the near future.The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1068 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (44437) and SecurityFocus (BID 30592†). Similar entries are available at VDB-43594 and VDB-43593. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.oracle.com/sun/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 10.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.8
VulDB Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Temp Score: 8.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Access controlCWE: CWE-264
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Unproven
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/07/2008 🔍08/08/2008 🔍
08/08/2008 🔍
08/08/2008 🔍
03/17/2015 🔍
11/24/2017 🔍
Sources
Vendor: oracle.comAdvisory: securityfocus.com⛔
Organization: Security Explorations
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2008-3553 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2008-3553
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-43595
X-Force: 44437 - Nokia Series 40 multiple unspecified code execution
SecurityFocus: 30592 - Nokia Series 40 Multiple Unspecified Unauthorized Access Vulnerabilities
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/17/2015 12:19Updated: 11/24/2017 08:23
Changes: 03/17/2015 12:19 (48), 11/24/2017 08:23 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.