Fortinet FortiMail up to 7.2.9/7.4.8/7.6.6/8.0.1 improper authorization
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00+ |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Fortinet FortiMail up to 7.2.9/7.4.8/7.6.6/8.0.1. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. Performing a manipulation results in improper authorization. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2026-126155. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Fortinet FortiMail up to 7.2.9/7.4.8/7.6.6/8.0.1. It has been classified as critical. This affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper authorization vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-285. The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain an authenticated IBE webmail session as any IBE recipient and read or send their encrypted mail via crafted HTTP requests.
The advisory is shared at fortiguard.fortinet.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-126155 since 11/10/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 11/11/2026). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1548.002 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 7.2.0
- 7.2.1
- 7.2.2
- 7.2.3
- 7.2.4
- 7.2.5
- 7.2.6
- 7.2.7
- 7.2.8
- 7.2.9
- 7.4.0
- 7.4.1
- 7.4.2
- 7.4.3
- 7.4.4
- 7.4.5
- 7.4.6
- 7.4.7
- 7.4.8
- 7.6.0
- 7.6.1
- 7.6.2
- 7.6.3
- 7.6.4
- 7.6.5
- 7.6.6
- 8.0.0
- 8.0.1
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.fortinet.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.2
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 9.1
CNA Vector (fortinet): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper authorizationCWE: CWE-285 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
11/10/2026 CVE reserved11/11/2026 Advisory disclosed
11/11/2026 VulDB entry created
11/11/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: fortinet.comAdvisory: fortiguard.fortinet.com
Status: Confirmed
CNA: fortinet
CVE: CVE-2026-126155 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-126155
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-436029
Entry
Created: 11/11/2026 22:47Changes: 11/11/2026 22:47 (60)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.