CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
6.3$0-$5k0.00+

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in FRRouting. It has been classified as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component bgpd. This manipulation causes resource consumption. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2026-120033. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability classified as critical was found in FRRouting (unknown version). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block of the component bgpd. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a resource consumption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-400. The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:

In FRRouting 10.1 and later, bgpd does not correctly close a BGP session when the Send Hold Timer (RFC 9687) expires, i.e. when a neighbor has stopped accepting data from the router for twice the hold time. The connection is closed, but bgpd still considers the session to be up. A BGP neighbor that keeps sending KEEPALIVEs but stops reading from its connection, at a time when the router has a large amount of data to send to it (for example while sending it a full routing table), can cause one of the following: * If the neighbor announced Graceful Restart support: bgpd crashes shortly after the session is closed (after the neighbor's announced restart time plus one keepalive interval), taking down all BGP sessions on the router. The neighbor can repeat this each time bgpd restarts. * Otherwise: the session stays stuck in the Established state. The neighbor's routes stay installed and keep being advertised to other peers, and the neighbor cannot reconnect until an operator runs "clear bgp <neighbor>". The neighbor does not need to be malicious; an overloaded or stuck peer can trigger the same behavior. Required configuration: no special configuration is needed. Any BGP neighbor with an established session can trigger the issue under default settings, for example: router bgp 65001 neighbor 192.0.2.2 remote-as 65002 Graceful Restart helper mode, which leads to the crash, is enabled by default. With default timers (keepalive 60s, hold time 180s), the session is closed about 6 minutes after the neighbor stops reading.

It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-120033 since 10/30/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1499 according to MITRE ATT&CK.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Name

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.5
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.3

VulDB Base Score: 6.5
VulDB Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Resource consumption
CWE: CWE-400 / CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔒

Timelineinfo

10/30/2026 CVE reserved
11/12/2026 +13 days Advisory disclosed
11/12/2026 +0 days VulDB entry created
11/12/2026 +0 days VulDB entry last update

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: github.com
Status: Not defined

CNA: NetDEF
CVE: CVE-2026-120033 (🔒)

GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-120033
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-436483

Entryinfo

Created: 11/12/2026 20:06
Changes: 11/12/2026 20:06 (65)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!