| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in lustre Lustre-tests 1.6.5/1.6.5.1. The impacted element is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to link following. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2008-4970. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in lustre Lustre-tests 1.6.5/1.6.5.1. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown code. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a link following vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-59. The product attempts to access a file based on the filename, but it does not properly prevent that filename from identifying a link or shortcut that resolves to an unintended resource. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
runiozone in lustre 1.6.5 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on the /tmp/iozone.log temporary file.
The weakness was shared 11/06/2008 (Website). The advisory is shared at bugs.gentoo.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2008-4970 since 11/06/2008. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
It is declared as highly functional.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (44819) and SecurityFocus (BID 30911†). The entries VDB-44966, VDB-44935, VDB-44934 and VDB-44933 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.0
VulDB Base Score: 8.4
VulDB Temp Score: 8.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Link followingCWE: CWE-59
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Highly functional
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/24/2008 🔍11/06/2008 🔍
11/06/2008 🔍
11/06/2008 🔍
03/17/2015 🔍
10/14/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: bugs.gentoo.orgStatus: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2008-4970 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2008-4970
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-44909
X-Force: 44819 - Debian lustre-tests temporary file symlink
SecurityFocus: 30911 - Debian lustre-tests Insecure Temporary File Creation Vulnerability
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/17/2015 16:11Updated: 10/14/2018 08:32
Changes: 03/17/2015 16:11 (48), 10/14/2018 08:32 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.