| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Visicommedia AceFTP 3.80.3 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to path traversal. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2008-5175. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Visicommedia AceFTP 3.80.3. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-22. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Directory traversal vulnerability in the FTP client in AceFTP Freeware 3.80.3 and AceFTP Pro 3.80.3 allows remote FTP servers to create or overwrite arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in a response to a LIST command, a related issue to CVE-2002-1345.
The weakness was published 11/19/2008 by Tan Chew Keong (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2008-5175 since 11/19/2008. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1006 for this issue.
It is declared as highly functional.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (43400), SecurityFocus (BID 29989†) and Secunia (SA30792†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.5
VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Highly functional
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
OpenVAS ID: 800307
OpenVAS Name: AceFTP LIST Command Directory Traversal Vulnerability
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/27/2008 🔍06/27/2008 🔍
11/19/2008 🔍
11/19/2008 🔍
11/19/2008 🔍
03/17/2015 🔍
10/14/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: Tan Chew Keong
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2008-5175 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2008-5175
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-45125
X-Force: 43400 - AceFTP LIST directory traversal
SecurityFocus: 29989 - AceFTP 'LIST' Command Directory Traversal Vulnerability
Secunia: 30792 - AceFTP Directory Download Directory Traversal Vulnerability, Less Critical
Vupen: ADV-2008-1954
Entry
Created: 03/17/2015 16:11Updated: 10/14/2018 08:49
Changes: 03/17/2015 16:11 (56), 10/14/2018 08:49 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:9FB:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.