Phonecian Casino FlashAX 1.0.0.7 ActiveX Control memory corruption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Phonecian Casino FlashAX 1.0.0.7. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component ActiveX Control. This manipulation causes memory corruption. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2008-5691. In addition, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as very critical was found in Phonecian Casino FlashAX 1.0.0.7. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component ActiveX Control. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Heap-based buffer overflow in the Phoenician Casino FlashAX ActiveX control 1.0.0.7 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long argument to the SetID method.
The weakness was presented 12/19/2008 (Website). The advisory is shared at xforce.iss.net. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2008-5691. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD at the moment (estimation calculated on 11/19/2024).
It is possible to download the exploit at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (47448), SecurityFocus (BID 32901†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-29784†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 10.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.1
VulDB Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Temp Score: 9.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/17/2008 🔍12/19/2008 🔍
12/19/2008 🔍
12/19/2008 🔍
12/19/2008 🔍
02/15/2011 🔍
03/17/2015 🔍
11/19/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: xforce.iss.netStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2008-5691 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2008-5691
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-45613
X-Force: 47448
SecurityFocus: 32901
Vulnerability Center: 29784 - Phoenician Casino FlashAX 1.0.0.7 Remote Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability, Medium
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 03/17/2015 16:11Updated: 11/19/2024 10:16
Changes: 03/17/2015 16:11 (46), 03/15/2017 14:19 (10), 08/03/2021 18:36 (3), 08/03/2021 18:44 (2), 11/19/2024 10:16 (19)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.