| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in TYPO3 Wir Ber Uns Extension up to 0.0.24. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2008-5799. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in TYPO3 Wir Ber Uns Extension up to 0.0.24 (Content Management System). This issue affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Wir ber uns (fsmi_people) extension 0.0.24 and earlier for TYPO3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
The weakness was released 12/31/2008 by Georg Ringer (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at typo3.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2008-5799 since 12/30/2008. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
It is declared as highly functional.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (46471) and SecurityFocus (BID 32237†). Entries connected to this vulnerability are available at VDB-45733, VDB-45732, VDB-45730 and VDB-45729. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 0.0.1
- 0.0.2
- 0.0.3
- 0.0.4
- 0.0.5
- 0.0.6
- 0.0.7
- 0.0.8
- 0.0.9
- 0.0.10
- 0.0.11
- 0.0.12
- 0.0.13
- 0.0.14
- 0.0.15
- 0.0.16
- 0.0.17
- 0.0.18
- 0.0.19
- 0.0.20
- 0.0.21
- 0.0.22
- 0.0.23
- 0.0.24
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Highly functional
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/10/2008 🔍12/30/2008 🔍
12/31/2008 🔍
12/31/2008 🔍
03/17/2015 🔍
11/29/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: typo3.orgResearcher: Georg Ringer
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2008-5799 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2008-5799
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-45731
X-Force: 46471 - Wir ber uns extension for TYPO3 unspecified cross-site scripting
SecurityFocus: 32237 - TYPO3 Wir ber uns Extension SQL Injection and Cross Site Scripting Vulnerabilities
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/17/2015 16:11Updated: 11/29/2017 14:27
Changes: 03/17/2015 16:11 (50), 11/29/2017 14:27 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.