OpenSSL crypto_drv.c DSA_do_verify improper authentication ⚔ [Disputed]
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in OpenSSL. It has been rated as problematic. This affects the function DSA_do_verify in the library lib/crypto/c_src/crypto_drv.c. Performing a manipulation results in improper authentication.
This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2009-0130. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
It is still unclear if this vulnerability genuinely exists.
Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in OpenSSL (Network Encryption Software) (version unknown). This affects the function DSA_do_verify in the library lib/crypto/c_src/crypto_drv.c. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper authentication vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-287. When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
** DISPUTED ** lib/crypto/c_src/crypto_drv.c in erlang does not properly check the return value from the OpenSSL DSA_do_verify function, which might allow remote attackers to bypass validation of the certificate chain via a malformed SSL/TLS signature, a similar vulnerability to CVE-2008-5077. NOTE: a package maintainer disputes this issue, reporting that there is a proper check within the only code that uses the applicable part of crypto_drv.c, and thus "this report is invalid."
The weakness was disclosed 01/15/2009 (oss-sec). It is possible to read the advisory at openwall.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2009-0130 since 01/15/2009. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 35310 (CentOS 3 / 4 / 5 : openssl (CESA-2009:0004)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family CentOS Local Security Checks and running in the context l.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published 3 weeks after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Tenable (35310). The entries VDB-45926, VDB-45925, VDB-45924 and VDB-45798 are pretty similar. Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
License
Website
- Product: https://www.openssl.org/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.5
CNA Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper authenticationCWE: CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 35310
Nessus Name: CentOS 3 / 4 / 5 : openssl (CESA-2009:0004)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/07/2009 🔍01/15/2009 🔍
01/15/2009 🔍
01/15/2009 🔍
02/03/2009 🔍
03/17/2015 🔍
01/21/2025 🔍
Sources
Product: openssl.orgAdvisory: openwall.com
Status: Confirmed
Disputed: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2009-0130 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2009-0130
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-45927
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/17/2015 16:11Updated: 01/21/2025 17:28
Changes: 03/17/2015 16:11 (57), 05/03/2019 11:18 (2), 08/07/2024 08:20 (17), 01/21/2025 17:28 (13)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.