| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Ocp2 Omnicom Content Platform 2.0. The impacted element is an unknown function. This manipulation of the argument root causes path traversal. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2008-5997. Additionally, an exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Ocp2 Omnicom Content Platform 2.0. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code. The manipulation of the argument root with an unknown input leads to a path traversal vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-22. The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Absolute path traversal vulnerability in admin/fileKontrola/browser.asp in Omnicom Content Platform (OCP) 2.0 allows remote attackers to list arbitrary directories via a full pathname in the root parameter.
The weakness was released 01/28/2009 (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2008-5997 since 01/28/2009. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1006 for this issue.
It is possible to download the exploit at exploit-db.com. It is declared as highly functional.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (45394), Exploit-DB (32412) and SecurityFocus (BID 31338†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Path traversalCWE: CWE-22
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Highly functional
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/23/2008 🔍01/28/2009 🔍
01/28/2009 🔍
01/28/2009 🔍
03/17/2015 🔍
11/18/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2008-5997 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2008-5997
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-46141
X-Force: 45394 - Omnicom Content Platform browser.asp directory traversal
SecurityFocus: 31338 - Omnicom Content Platform 'browser.asp' Parameter Directory Traversal Vulnerability
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 03/17/2015 16:11Updated: 11/18/2024 23:03
Changes: 03/17/2015 16:11 (47), 12/07/2017 08:14 (6), 11/18/2024 23:03 (20)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.