PostgreSQL up to 8.3.6 Error Message resource management

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
4.1$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in PostgreSQL 7.4.24/8.0.20/8.1.16/8.2.12/8.3.6. The affected element is an unknown function of the component Error Message Handler. Performing a manipulation results in resource management. This vulnerability was named CVE-2009-0922. In addition, an exploit is available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in PostgreSQL 7.4.24/8.0.20/8.1.16/8.2.12/8.3.6 (Database Software). This affects an unknown code of the component Error Message Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a resource management vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-399. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:

PostgreSQL before 8.3.7, 8.2.13, 8.1.17, 8.0.21, and 7.4.25 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (stack consumption and crash) by triggering a failure in the conversion of a localized error message to a client-specified encoding, as demonstrated using mismatched encoding conversion requests.

The bug was discovered 02/27/2009. The weakness was presented 03/17/2009 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at vupen.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2009-0922 since 03/17/2009. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. A authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.

The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 30175 (Solaris 10 (x86) : 136999-10 (deprecated)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Solaris Local Security Checks and running in the context l. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 155768 (Oracle Enterprise Linux Update for PostgreSQL (ELSA-2009-1484)).

A possible mitigation has been published 3 years after the disclosure of the vulnerability.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (49219), Exploit-DB (32849), Tenable (30175), SecurityFocus (BID 34090†) and OSVDB (54512†). See VDB-50077 for similar entry. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Type

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1

VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Resource management
CWE: CWE-399 / CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 30175
Nessus Name: Solaris 10 (x86) : 136999-10 (deprecated)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍
Nessus Port: 🔍

OpenVAS ID: 63661
OpenVAS Name: Fedora Core 9 FEDORA-2009-2927 (postgresql)
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍

Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍

Exploit-DB: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

02/05/2008 🔍
02/27/2009 +388 days 🔍
02/27/2009 +0 days 🔍
03/11/2009 +12 days 🔍
03/17/2009 +6 days 🔍
03/17/2009 +0 days 🔍
03/17/2009 +0 days 🔍
03/18/2009 +1 days 🔍
03/24/2009 +6 days 🔍
03/30/2009 +6 days 🔍
06/09/2011 +801 days 🔍
03/17/2015 +1377 days 🔍
12/16/2024 +3562 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Product: postgresql.org

Advisory: vupen.com
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2009-0922 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2009-0922
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-47163

OVAL: 🔍

X-Force: 49219
SecurityFocus: 34090 - PostgreSQL Conversion Encoding Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability
Secunia: 34453 - Fedora update for postgresql, Less Critical
OSVDB: 54512 - CVE-2009-0922 - PostgreSQL - Denial of Service Issue
SecurityTracker: 1021860
Vulnerability Center: 21418 - PostgreSQL Mismatched Database Codepages within Conversion Functions Remote DoS Vulnerability, Medium
Vupen: ADV-2009-0767

scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/17/2015 23:38
Updated: 12/16/2024 05:12
Changes: 03/17/2015 23:38 (85), 08/31/2019 16:12 (4), 12/16/2024 05:12 (20)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!