| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Apple Mac OS X 10.5.6. It has been rated as critical. This impacts an unknown function of the component Safari. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2009-1042. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Apple Mac OS X 10.5.6 (Operating System). This issue affects an unknown function of the component Safari. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Unspecified vulnerability in Apple Safari on Mac OS X 10.5.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors triggered by clicking on a link, as demonstrated by Nils during a PWN2OWN competition at CanSecWest 2009.
The weakness was presented 03/23/2009 by Nils (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at xforce.iss.net. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2009-1042 since 03/23/2009. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 11/06/2018).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (49388), SecurityFocus (BID 34183†), OSVDB (52888†) and SecurityTracker (ID 1021879†). See VDB-47271 for similar entry. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Support
Website
- Vendor: https://www.apple.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 10.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.8
VulDB Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Temp Score: 8.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Unproven
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/19/2009 🔍03/20/2009 🔍
03/23/2009 🔍
03/23/2009 🔍
03/23/2009 🔍
03/26/2009 🔍
03/17/2015 🔍
11/06/2018 🔍
Sources
Vendor: apple.comAdvisory: xforce.iss.net
Researcher: Nils
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2009-1042 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2009-1042
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-47243
X-Force: 49388 - Apple Safari unspecified code execution variant 1
SecurityFocus: 34183 - Apple Safari Unspecified Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
OSVDB: 52888 - Apple Safari on Mac OS X Link Click Unspecified Arbitrary Code Execution (PWN2OWN)
SecurityTracker: 1021879
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20150108
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/17/2015 23:38Updated: 11/06/2018 07:55
Changes: 03/17/2015 23:38 (58), 11/06/2018 07:55 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.