Cisco Ironport WSA SSL Interception Proxy CRL/OCSP Certificate privileges management

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability categorized as problematic has been discovered in Cisco Ironport. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component WSA SSL Interception Proxy. The manipulation as part of CRL/OCSP Certificate results in privileges management. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2012-1316. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Cisco Ironport (affected version unknown). Affected is an unknown functionality of the component WSA SSL Interception Proxy. The manipulation as part of a CRL/OCSP Certificate leads to a privileges management vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. This is going to have an impact on integrity.
The weakness was shared 03/21/2012 by Jeff Jarmoc with Dell as not defined talk (Conference). The advisory is available at media.blackhat.com. The vendor was not involved in the coordination of the public release. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2012-1316 since 02/27/2012. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Technical details are unknown but a private exploit is available. The structure of the vulnerability defines a possible price range of USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 03/22/2021). This vulnerability is assigned to T1068 by the MITRE ATT&CK project.
It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at OSVDB (80993†) and Secunia (SA48752†). Further details are available at secureworks.com. The entries VDB-5035 and VDB-5036 are related to this item. If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Base Score: 6.5
VulDB Temp Score: 6.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.9
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Private
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/27/2012 🔍03/21/2012 🔍
04/09/2012 🔍
04/10/2012 🔍
04/10/2012 🔍
03/22/2021 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: media.blackhat.com
Researcher: Jeff Jarmoc
Organization: Dell
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2012-1316 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2012-1316
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-5034
Secunia: 48752 - Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance Multiple Vulnerabilities, Less Critical
OSVDB: 80993
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Misc.: 🔍
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 04/10/2012 10:45Updated: 03/22/2021 14:57
Changes: 04/10/2012 10:45 (46), 04/02/2019 09:48 (6), 03/22/2021 14:53 (2), 03/22/2021 14:57 (18)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:F78:103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.