Tim Nelson Shared Sign-On 5.x improper authentication

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
5.7$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability has been found in Tim Nelson Shared Sign-On 5.x and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. Performing a manipulation results in improper authentication. This vulnerability was named CVE-2009-3657. There is no available exploit.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Tim Nelson Shared Sign-On 5.x. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper authentication vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-287. When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, and integrity. The summary by CVE is:

Session fixation vulnerability in Shared Sign-On 5.x and 6.x, a module for Drupal, allows remote attackers to hijack web sessions via unspecified vectors.

The weakness was presented 10/09/2009 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at drupal.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2009-3657 since 10/09/2009. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (53560) and SecurityFocus (BID 36563†). See VDB-50402 for similar entry. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.5
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.7

VulDB Base Score: 6.5
VulDB Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Improper authentication
CWE: CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Unproven

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

09/30/2009 🔍
10/09/2009 +9 days 🔍
10/09/2009 +0 days 🔍
10/09/2009 +0 days 🔍
03/18/2015 +1986 days 🔍
12/26/2017 +1014 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: drupal.org
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2009-3657 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2009-3657
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-50403
X-Force: 53560 - Shared Sign On module for Drupal unspecified session hijacking
SecurityFocus: 36563 - Drupal Shared Sign On Module Cross-Site Request Forgery and Session Fixation Vulnerabilities

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/18/2015 15:15
Updated: 12/26/2017 08:52
Changes: 03/18/2015 15:15 (48), 12/26/2017 08:52 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Might our Artificial Intelligence support you?

Check our Alexa App!