Cisco Unified MeetingPlace up to 7.0.1 Administrator Account Remote Code Execution

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace up to 7.0.1. It has been classified as very critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Administrator Account. Performing a manipulation results in Remote Code Execution. This vulnerability was named CVE-2010-0140. There is no available exploit. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace up to 7.0.1 (Unified Communication Software). It has been classified as very critical. This affects an unknown code block of the component Administrator Account. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a remote code execution vulnerability. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the web server in Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 7 before 7.0(2.3) hotfix 5F, 6 before 6.0.639.3, and possibly 5 allow remote attackers to create (1) user or (2) administrator accounts via a crafted URL in a request to the internal interface, aka Bug IDs CSCtc59231 and CSCtd40661.
The weakness was presented 01/28/2010 (Website). The advisory is shared at cisco.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2010-0140. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/29/2026).
Upgrading to version 7.0.2 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 37965†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-24744†). See VDB-51695, VDB-51694 and VDB-51692 for similar entries. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.4
VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Remote Code ExecutionCWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Unified MeetingPlace 7.0.2
Timeline
01/04/2010 🔍01/27/2010 🔍
01/27/2010 🔍
01/28/2010 🔍
01/28/2010 🔍
02/02/2010 🔍
03/18/2015 🔍
04/29/2026 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: cisco.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2010-0140 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-0140
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-51693
SecurityFocus: 37965 - Cisco Unified MeetingPlace Multiple Vulnerabilities
Vulnerability Center: 24744 - [cisco-sa-20100127-mp] Cisco MeetingPlace Remote Administrator Accounts Creation Vulnerability, Critical
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/18/2015 15:15Updated: 04/29/2026 16:42
Changes: 03/18/2015 15:15 (49), 02/20/2017 10:21 (8), 08/31/2021 20:40 (3), 04/29/2026 16:42 (18)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.