| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8i. It has been classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cryptographic issue. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2010-0928. No exploit is available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in OpenSSL 0.9.8i (Network Encryption Software). This issue affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cryptographic issue vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-310. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
OpenSSL 0.9.8i on the Gaisler Research LEON3 SoC on the Xilinx Virtex-II Pro FPGA uses a Fixed Width Exponentiation (FWE) algorithm for certain signature calculations, and does not verify the signature before providing it to a caller, which makes it easier for physically proximate attackers to determine the private key via a modified supply voltage for the microprocessor, related to a "fault-based attack."
The issue has been introduced in 09/15/2008. The weakness was published 03/05/2010 (Website). The advisory is shared at osvdb.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2010-0928 since 03/05/2010. The exploitation is known to be difficult. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1600 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 536 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.
Upgrading to version 0.9.8i eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (56750) and OSVDB (62808†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
Support
- end of life (old version)
Website
- Product: https://www.openssl.org/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.9
VulDB Base Score: 5.1
VulDB Temp Score: 4.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cryptographic issueCWE: CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: OpenSSL 0.9.8i
Timeline
09/15/2008 🔍03/05/2010 🔍
03/05/2010 🔍
03/05/2010 🔍
03/05/2010 🔍
03/19/2015 🔍
05/01/2026 🔍
Sources
Product: openssl.orgAdvisory: osvdb.org⛔
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2010-0928 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-0928
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-52085
X-Force: 56750
OSVDB: 62808 - OpenSSL RSA Authentication Fault-Based Attack Key Disclosure Weakness
Entry
Created: 03/19/2015 12:22Updated: 05/01/2026 22:59
Changes: 03/19/2015 12:22 (51), 04/15/2019 07:41 (2), 05/01/2026 22:59 (19)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.