| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Tug TeX Live up to 2004. This affects an unknown function. This manipulation causes numeric error. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2010-0827. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Tug TeX Live up to 2004. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a numeric error vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-189. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Integer overflow in dvips in TeX Live 2009 and earlier, and teTeX, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted virtual font (VF) file associated with a DVI file.
The weakness was presented 05/07/2010 by Dan Rosenberg as Bug 572914 as not defined bug report (Bugzilla). It is possible to read the advisory at bugzilla.redhat.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2010-0827. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 46257 (CentOS 4 : tetex (CESA-2010:0399)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family CentOS Local Security Checks. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 155658 (Oracle Enterprise Linux Update for teTeX (ELSA-2010-0399)).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (46257), SecurityFocus (BID 39971†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-25750†). See VDB-39648 and VDB-53087 for similar entries. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Numeric errorCWE: CWE-189
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 46257
Nessus Name: CentOS 4 : tetex (CESA-2010:0399)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
OpenVAS ID: 880396
OpenVAS Name: CentOS Update for tetex CESA-2010:0399 centos4 i386
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/03/2010 🔍05/06/2010 🔍
05/06/2010 🔍
05/07/2010 🔍
05/07/2010 🔍
05/16/2010 🔍
03/19/2015 🔍
09/09/2021 🔍
Sources
Advisory: Bug 572914Researcher: Dan Rosenberg
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2010-0827 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-0827
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-53083
OVAL: 🔍
SecurityFocus: 39971 - TeX Live '.dvi' File Parsing (CVE-2010-0827) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Vulnerability Center: 25750 - TeX Live and teTeX Remote Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability via a Crafted Virtual Font File, Medium
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/19/2015 12:22Updated: 09/09/2021 01:24
Changes: 03/19/2015 12:22 (60), 02/24/2017 11:05 (9), 09/09/2021 01:17 (4), 09/09/2021 01:24 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.