Consona Dynamic Agent Default Configuration pluginlicense.ini config

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability classified as very critical has been found in Consona Dynamic Agent. Impacted is an unknown function in the library tgctlcm.dll of the file pluginlicense.ini of the component Default Configuration. Performing a manipulation results in config. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2010-1913. No exploit exists.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as very critical, was found in Consona Dynamic Agent (version now known). This affects some unknown processing in the library tgctlcm.dll of the file pluginlicense.ini of the component Default Configuration. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a config vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-16. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

The default configuration of pluginlicense.ini for the SdcWebSecureBase interface in tgctlcm.dll in Consona Live Assistance, Dynamic Agent, and Subscriber Assistance, when downloaded from a server operated by Telefonica or possibly other companies, contains an incorrect DNS whitelist that includes the DNS hostnames of home computers of many persons, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended restrictions on ActiveX execution by hosting an ActiveX control on an applicable home web server.

The weakness was disclosed 05/12/2010 as confirmed advisory (CERT.org). The advisory is shared at kb.cert.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2010-1913 since 05/11/2010. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 12/29/2024). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592.004 for this issue.

By approaching the search of inurl:pluginlicense.ini it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The entries VDB-53156, VDB-53155, VDB-53154 and VDB-53153 are pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

• Consona

Name

• Dynamic Agent

CPE 2.3info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CPE 2.2info

• 🔍
• 🔍
• 🔍

CVSSv4info

CVSSv3info

CVSSv2info

Exploitinginfo

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Countermeasuresinfo

Timelineinfo

Sourcesinfo

Entryinfo

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion