| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Kevinhankens TableField 6.x-1.0/6.x-1.1. It has been rated as problematic. The impacted element is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2010-1998. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Kevinhankens TableField 6.x-1.0/6.x-1.1. This issue affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the CCK TableField module 6.x before 6.x-1.2 for Drupal allows remote authenticated users, with certain node creation or editing privileges, to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via table headers.
The weakness was released 05/05/2010 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at vupen.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2010-1998 since 05/20/2010. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The attack may be initiated remotely. The successful exploitation requires a simple authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
It is declared as proof-of-concept.
Upgrading to version 6.x-1.0 eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (58353), SecurityFocus (BID 39954†), OSVDB (64358†) and Secunia (SA39644†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍
Upgrade: TableField 6.x-1.0
Timeline
05/05/2010 🔍05/05/2010 🔍
05/05/2010 🔍
05/06/2010 🔍
05/20/2010 🔍
05/20/2010 🔍
03/19/2015 🔍
02/05/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: vupen.com⛔Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2010-1998 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-1998
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-53291
X-Force: 58353
SecurityFocus: 39954 - Drupal CCK TableField Module Cross Site Scripting Vulnerability
Secunia: 39644
OSVDB: 64358 - CCK TableField Module for Drupal Table Headers XSS
Vupen: ADV-2010-1080
Entry
Created: 03/19/2015 12:22Updated: 02/05/2019 15:22
Changes: 03/19/2015 12:22 (52), 02/05/2019 15:22 (7)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.