IBM Communications Server up to 6.1.2 npb_protocol_error GDSID input validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in IBM Communications Server up to 6.1.2. Affected by this issue is the function npb_protocol_error. Such manipulation of the argument GDSID leads to input validation.
This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2010-2090. There is no exploit available.
You should upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in IBM Communications Server up to 6.1.2 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is the function npb_protocol_error. The manipulation of the argument GDSID with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. Impacted is availability. CVE summarizes:
The npb_protocol_error function in sna V5router64 in IBM Communications Server for Windows 6.1.3 and Communications Server for AIX (aka CSAIX or CS/AIX) in sna.rte before 6.3.1.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via APPC data containing a GDSID variable with a GDS length that is too small.
The weakness was shared 05/27/2010 (Website). The advisory is shared for download at www-01.ibm.com. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2010-2090 since 05/27/2010. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be launched remotely. No form of authentication is required for exploitation. There are known technical details, but no exploit is available.
It is declared as proof-of-concept.
Upgrading to version 6.1.3 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (58874), SecurityFocus (BID 40372†) and Secunia (SA39909†). VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.ibm.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.6
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Communications Server 6.1.3
Timeline
05/19/2010 🔍05/26/2010 🔍
05/27/2010 🔍
05/27/2010 🔍
05/27/2010 🔍
03/19/2015 🔍
12/29/2017 🔍
Sources
Vendor: ibm.comAdvisory: www-01.ibm.com
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2010-2090 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-2090
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-53384
X-Force: 58874 - IBM Communications Server for AIX APPC denial of service
SecurityFocus: 40372 - IBM Communications Server for AIX Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability
Secunia: 39909 - IBM Communications Server APPC Denial of Service Vulnerability, Less Critical
Vupen: ADV-2010-1244
Entry
Created: 03/19/2015 12:22Updated: 12/29/2017 11:55
Changes: 03/19/2015 12:22 (57), 12/29/2017 11:55 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.