| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Richrumble ClearSite 4.50. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file docs.php. The manipulation leads to code injection. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2010-2145. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Richrumble ClearSite 4.50. This issue affects an unknown functionality of the file docs.php. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a code injection vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-94. The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in ClearSite Beta 4.50, and possibly other versions, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the cs_base_path parameter to (1) docs.php and (2) include/admin/device_admin.php. NOTE: the header.php vector is already covered by CVE-2009-3306. NOTE: this issue may be due to a variable extraction error.
The weakness was presented 06/03/2010 by ryan (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2010-2145 since 06/03/2010. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059 for this issue.
By approaching the search of inurl:docs.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 40457†). See VDB-50156 for similar entry. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Code injectionCWE: CWE-94 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Suricata ID: 2011209
Suricata Class: 🔍
Suricata Message: 🔍
Timeline
05/27/2010 🔍06/03/2010 🔍
06/03/2010 🔍
06/03/2010 🔍
03/19/2015 🔍
02/06/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: ryan
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2010-2145 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-2145
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-53453
SecurityFocus: 40457 - Clearsite 'header.php' Remote File Include Vulnerability
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/19/2015 12:22Updated: 02/06/2019 14:00
Changes: 03/19/2015 12:22 (50), 02/06/2019 14:00 (5)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.