Oracle Secure Backup 10.3.0.1 improper authentication

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
5.1$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability has been found in Oracle Secure Backup 10.3.0.1 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. This manipulation causes improper authentication. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2010-0904. In addition, an exploit is available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Oracle Secure Backup 10.3.0.1 (Backup Software). It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper authentication vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-287. When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:

Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Secure Backup 10.3.0.1 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors.

The weakness was presented 07/13/2010 with Oracle (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at oracle.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2010-0904. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.

A public exploit has been developed in Ruby. It is possible to download the exploit at securityfocus.com. It is declared as highly functional. The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 47747 (Oracle Secure Backup Administration Server login.php Authentication Bypass), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family CGI abuses. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 19567 (Oracle Secure Backup Administration Server Authentication Bypass Vulnerability).

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product. Furthermore it is possible to detect and prevent this kind of attack with TippingPoint and the filter 10454.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (47747), SecurityFocus (BID 41608†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-26424†). See VDB-4203, VDB-54082, VDB-54081 and VDB-54080 for similar entries. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1

VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Improper authentication
CWE: CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Highly functional
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 47747
Nessus Name: Oracle Secure Backup Administration Server login.php Authentication Bypass
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍

Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍

MetaSploit ID: osb_execqr3.rb
MetaSploit Name: Oracle Secure Backup Authentication Bypass/Command Injection Vulnerability
MetaSploit File: 🔍

Exploit-DB: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍
TippingPoint: 🔍

McAfee IPS: 🔍
McAfee IPS Version: 🔍

ISS Proventia IPS: 🔍
PaloAlto IPS: 🔍
Fortigate IPS: 🔍

Timelineinfo

03/03/2010 🔍
07/13/2010 +132 days 🔍
07/13/2010 +0 days 🔍
07/13/2010 +0 days 🔍
07/13/2010 +0 days 🔍
07/14/2010 +1 days 🔍
07/16/2010 +2 days 🔍
03/19/2015 +1707 days 🔍
01/27/2025 +3602 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: oracle.com

Advisory: oracle.com
Organization: Oracle
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2010-0904 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-0904
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-54043
SecurityFocus: 41608 - Oracle Secure Backup CVE-2010-0904 Remote Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
Secunia: 40595
Vulnerability Center: 26424 - [cpujul2010-155308] Oracle Secure Backup 10.3.0.1 Administration Server Authentication Bypass, Medium

scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/19/2015 14:37
Updated: 01/27/2025 06:04
Changes: 03/19/2015 14:37 (61), 03/01/2017 09:53 (14), 09/20/2021 15:04 (4), 09/20/2021 15:05 (3), 01/27/2025 06:04 (20)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!