Cisco Firewall Services Module Software up to 3.x denial of service

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Cisco Firewall Services Module Software up to 3.x. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Firewall Services Module. Performing a manipulation results in denial of service. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2010-2818. No exploit is available. Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Cisco Firewall Services Module Software up to 3.x (Firewall Software). It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown function of the component Firewall Services Module. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
Unspecified vulnerability in the SunRPC inspection feature on the Cisco Firewall Services Module (FWSM) with software 3.1 before 3.1(17.2), 3.2 before 3.2(16.1), 4.0 before 4.0(10.1), and 4.1 before 4.1(1.1) for Catalyst 6500 series switches and 7600 series routers allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted SunRPC messages, aka Bug ID CSCte61710.
The weakness was published 08/09/2010 (Website). The advisory is shared at cisco.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2010-2818. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
Upgrading to version 3.2%2814%29 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Vulnerability Center (SBV-26688†). Similar entries are available at VDB-54288, VDB-54287 and VDB-54286. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Firewall Services Module Software 3.2%2814%29
Timeline
07/23/2010 🔍08/04/2010 🔍
08/05/2010 🔍
08/09/2010 🔍
08/09/2010 🔍
03/19/2015 🔍
09/22/2021 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: cisco.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2010-2818 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-2818
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-54285
Secunia: 40843
Vulnerability Center: 26688 - [cisco-sa-20100804-fwsm] Cisco FWSM SunRPC Remote Denial of Service Vulnerabilities [CSCte61710], High
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/19/2015 14:37Updated: 09/22/2021 00:23
Changes: 03/19/2015 14:37 (49), 03/02/2017 10:58 (6), 09/22/2021 00:23 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.