Hulihanapplications DiamondList 0.1.6 cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Hulihanapplications DiamondList 0.1.6 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2010-3024. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. Furthermore, an exploit is available. It is advisable to introduce extra authentication.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Hulihanapplications DiamondList 0.1.6 and classified as problematic. This issue affects an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in user/main/update_user in DiamondList 0.1.6, and possibly earlier, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) change the administrative password or (2) change the site s configuration.
The weakness was published 08/05/2010 (Website). The advisory is shared at marc.info. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2010-3024 since 08/16/2010. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
The exploit is available at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
It is possible to mitigate the problem by adding an authentication mechanism. A possible mitigation has been published before and not just after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (60937), Exploit-DB (14565), OSVDB (66918†) and Secunia (SA40873†). Similar entry is available at VDB-54364. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.6
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: AuthenticationStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/22/2010 🔍08/05/2010 🔍
08/06/2010 🔍
08/16/2010 🔍
08/16/2010 🔍
03/19/2015 🔍
03/09/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: marc.infoStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2010-3024 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-3024
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-54365
X-Force: 60937
Secunia: 40873
OSVDB: 66918 - DiamondList user/main/update_user Admin Password Manipulation CSRF
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/19/2015 14:37Updated: 03/09/2025 22:44
Changes: 03/19/2015 14:37 (54), 02/06/2019 17:11 (4), 03/09/2025 22:44 (20)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.