| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability described as critical has been identified in Icon-labs Iconfidant SSL Server up to 1.2.8. The impacted element is an unknown function. The manipulation results in memory corruption. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2011-0651. No exploit is available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Icon-labs Iconfidant SSL Server up to 1.2.8. Affected is an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:
Buffer overflow in the key exchange functionality in Icon Labs Iconfidant SSL Server before 1.3.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a client master key packet in which the sum of unspecified length fields is greater than a certain value.
The weakness was published 01/20/2011 by TippingPoint with TippingPoint's Zero Day Initiative (Website). The advisory is available at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2011-0651 since 01/26/2011. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not available.
Upgrading to version 1.2.9 eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (64868), SecurityFocus (BID 45938†), OSVDB (70599†) and Secunia (SA42971†). If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Unproven
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Iconfidant SSL Server 1.2.9
Timeline
01/20/2011 🔍01/20/2011 🔍
01/20/2011 🔍
01/21/2011 🔍
01/21/2011 🔍
01/26/2011 🔍
01/28/2011 🔍
03/20/2015 🔍
01/10/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: TippingPoint
Organization: TippingPoint's Zero Day Initiative
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2011-0651 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2011-0651
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-56250
X-Force: 64868 - Iconfidant SSL buffer overflow
SecurityFocus: 45938 - Iconfidant SSL Server Key Length Remote Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Secunia: 42971 - Iconfidant SSL Server Key Exchange Buffer Overflow Vulnerability, Highly Critical
OSVDB: 70599 - Iconfidant SSL Server Key Exchange Client Master Key Packet Overflow
Entry
Created: 03/20/2015 16:16Updated: 01/10/2018 07:53
Changes: 03/20/2015 16:16 (56), 01/10/2018 07:53 (8)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.