McAfee SaaS Endpoint Protection up to 5.2.1 ActiveX Control MyASUtil.SecureObjectFactory.CreateSecureObject MyASUtil.InstallInfo.RunUserProgram access control

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
6.3$5k-$25k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in McAfee SaaS Endpoint Protection up to 5.2.1. This issue affects the function MyASUtil.InstallInfo.RunUserProgram in the library MyAsUtil5.2.0.603.dll of the file MyASUtil.SecureObjectFactory.CreateSecureObject of the component ActiveX Control. Performing a manipulation results in access control. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2011-3006. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in McAfee SaaS Endpoint Protection up to 5.2.1. It has been classified as critical. This affects the function MyASUtil.InstallInfo.RunUserProgram in the library MyAsUtil5.2.0.603.dll of the file MyASUtil.SecureObjectFactory.CreateSecureObject of the component ActiveX Control. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a access control vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-264. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

The MyAsUtil ActiveX control in MyAsUtil5.2.0.603.dll in McAfee SaaS Endpoint Protection 5.2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass the MyASUtil.SecureObjectFactory.CreateSecureObject domain execution policy using a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack, execute arbitrary code using the MyASUtil.InstallInfo.RunUserProgram function, and possibly conduct other unspecified attacks.

The weakness was disclosed 08/10/2011 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at kc.mcafee.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2011-3006 since 08/02/2011. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 11/17/2021). The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1068 according to MITRE ATT&CK.

The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 57728 (McAfee Security-as-a-Service (SaaS) < 5.2.2 ActiveX Controls Arbitrary Code Execution (SB10016)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Windows.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (69094), Tenable (57728), SecurityFocus (BID 49088†), OSVDB (74512†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-32816†). The entry VDB-58228 is pretty similar. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.3

VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Access control
CWE: CWE-264
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 57728
Nessus Name: McAfee Security-as-a-Service (SaaS) < 5.2.2 ActiveX Controls Arbitrary Code Execution (SB10016)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍

OpenVAS ID: 902562
OpenVAS Name: McAfee SaaS Endpoint Protection ActiveX Controls Multiple Code Execution Vulnerabilities
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

08/02/2011 🔍
08/04/2011 +2 days 🔍
08/08/2011 +4 days 🔍
08/10/2011 +2 days 🔍
08/10/2011 +0 days 🔍
08/22/2011 +12 days 🔍
01/30/2012 +161 days 🔍
03/23/2015 +1148 days 🔍
11/17/2021 +2431 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: mcafee.com

Advisory: kc.mcafee.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2011-3006 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2011-3006
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-58227
X-Force: 69094
SecurityFocus: 49088 - McAfee SaaS Endpoint Protection 'MyAsUtil5.2.0.603.dll' ActiveX Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
OSVDB: 74512
Vulnerability Center: 32816 - McAfee SaaS Endpoint Protection 5.2.1 and earlier Remote Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability, Medium

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/23/2015 16:50
Updated: 11/17/2021 13:08
Changes: 03/23/2015 16:50 (62), 03/30/2017 09:43 (10), 11/17/2021 13:08 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!