| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Oracle Solaris 8/9/10/11 Express. This affects an unknown function of the component Filesystem. Performing a manipulation results in denial of service. This vulnerability was named CVE-2011-3537. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Oracle Solaris 8/9/10/11 Express (Operating System). This affects an unknown code of the component Filesystem. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Solaris 8, 9, 10, and 11 Express allows local users to affect availability via unknown vectors related to Kernel/Filesystem.
The weakness was presented 10/18/2011 with Oracle (Website). The advisory is shared at xforce.iss.net. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2011-3537. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 119687 (Solaris Kernel/FileSystem Local Denial of Service Vulnerability).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (70810), SecurityFocus (BID 50259†), OSVDB (76472†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-33609†). See VDB-59137, VDB-59135, VDB-59132 and VDB-59130 for similar entries. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.oracle.com
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.5
VulDB Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Temp Score: 7.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/16/2011 🔍10/18/2011 🔍
10/18/2011 🔍
10/18/2011 🔍
10/19/2011 🔍
10/26/2011 🔍
03/23/2015 🔍
01/06/2025 🔍
Sources
Vendor: oracle.comAdvisory: xforce.iss.net
Organization: Oracle
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2011-3537 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2011-3537
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-59133
OVAL: 🔍
X-Force: 70810
SecurityFocus: 50259 - Oracle Sun Product Suite CVE-2011-3537 Local Vulnerability
OSVDB: 76472
Vulnerability Center: 33609 - [cpuoct2011-330135] Oracle Solaris 8-11 Express Kernel/Filesystem Local DoS Vulnerability, Medium
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/23/2015 16:50Updated: 01/06/2025 00:02
Changes: 03/23/2015 16:50 (50), 04/04/2017 11:23 (11), 11/24/2021 08:41 (4), 01/06/2025 00:02 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.