Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server up to X7.0.0 resource management

| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server up to X7.0.0. The affected element is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to resource management. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2012-0331. There is not any exploit available. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server up to X7.0.0 (Unified Communication Software) and classified as critical. This issue affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a resource management vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-399. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server with software before X7.0.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device crash) via a crafted SIP packet, as demonstrated by a SIP INVITE message from a Tandberg device, aka Bug ID CSCtq73319.
The weakness was released 02/29/2012 with Cisco as cisco-sa-20120229-vcs as confirmed advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at tools.cisco.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2012-0331 since 01/04/2012. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
Upgrading to version X7.0.1 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (73559), SecurityFocus (BID 52214†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-34567†). Entry connected to this vulnerability is available at VDB-60340. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.0
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Resource managementCWE: CWE-399 / CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: TelePresence Video Communication Server X7.0.1
Timeline
01/04/2012 🔍02/29/2012 🔍
02/29/2012 🔍
02/29/2012 🔍
02/29/2012 🔍
03/06/2012 🔍
03/23/2015 🔍
04/09/2017 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: cisco-sa-20120229-vcs
Organization: Cisco
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2012-0331 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2012-0331
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-60341
X-Force: 73559
SecurityFocus: 52214 - Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server Session Denial of Service Vulnerabilities
Vulnerability Center: 34567 - [cisco-sa-20120229-vcs] Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server Remote DoS via SIP Message (2), High
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/23/2015 16:50Updated: 04/09/2017 21:30
Changes: 03/23/2015 16:50 (53), 04/09/2017 21:30 (10)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:D6F:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.