Best Practical RT up to 4.0.5 Access Restriction access control
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Best Practical RT up to 4.0.5. It has been classified as critical. The affected element is an unknown function of the component Access Restriction. Performing a manipulation results in access control. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2011-5093. There is not any exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Best Practical RT up to 4.0.5 (Ticket Tracking Software). It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown code block of the component Access Restriction. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a access control vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-264. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Best Practical Solutions RT 4.x before 4.0.6 does not properly implement the DisallowExecuteCode option, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and execute arbitrary code by leveraging access to a privileged account, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-4458 and CVE-2011-5092.
The weakness was released 06/04/2012 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at lists.bestpractical.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2011-5093 since 06/04/2012. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The requirement for exploitation is a authentication. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1068 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 61434 (Request Tracker 3.x < 3.8.12 / 4.x < 4.0.6 Multiple Vulnerabilities), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family CGI abuses and running in the context r.
Upgrading to version 3.8.12 eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published even before and not after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (61434) and SecurityFocus (BID 53660†). Entries connected to this vulnerability are available at VDB-60890, VDB-60889, VDB-60888 and VDB-60887. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Access controlCWE: CWE-264
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 61434
Nessus Name: Request Tracker 3.x < 3.8.12 / 4.x < 4.0.6 Multiple Vulnerabilities
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: RT 3.8.12
Timeline
05/22/2012 🔍06/04/2012 🔍
06/04/2012 🔍
06/04/2012 🔍
08/06/2012 🔍
03/23/2015 🔍
02/17/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: lists.bestpractical.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2011-5093 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2011-5093
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-60891
SecurityFocus: 53660
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/23/2015 16:50Updated: 02/17/2019 10:52
Changes: 03/23/2015 16:50 (57), 02/17/2019 10:52 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:D80:103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.