Moshe Weitzman Organic Groups up to 6.x-2.0 cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Moshe Weitzman Organic Groups up to 6.x-2.0. This impacts an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2012-3800. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Moshe Weitzman Organic Groups up to 6.x-2.0. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in og.js in the Organic Groups (OG) module 6.x-2.x before 6.x-2.4 for Drupal, when used with the Vertical Tabs module, allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related the group title.
The weakness was published 06/26/2012 (Website). The advisory is shared at drupalcode.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2012-3800 since 06/26/2012. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The successful exploitation needs a authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
It is declared as highly functional.
Upgrading to version 6.x-2.1 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (76149), SecurityFocus (BID 53838†), OSVDB (82712†) and Secunia (SA49397†). Similar entry is available at VDB-61113. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Highly functional
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Organic Groups 6.x-2.1
Timeline
06/06/2012 🔍06/26/2012 🔍
06/26/2012 🔍
06/26/2012 🔍
03/23/2015 🔍
01/24/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: drupalcode.orgStatus: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2012-3800 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2012-3800
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-61125
X-Force: 76149 - Organic Groups module for Drupal unspecified cross-site scripting
SecurityFocus: 53838 - Drupal Organic Groups Module Cross Site Scripting and Security Bypass Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 49397
OSVDB: 82712
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/23/2015 16:50Updated: 01/24/2018 10:20
Changes: 03/23/2015 16:50 (52), 01/24/2018 10:20 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.