| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in WinRadius 2009. Affected is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in denial of service. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2012-3816. Moreover, an exploit is present.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in WinRadius 2009. This affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
WinRadius Server 2009 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long password in an Access-Request packet.
The weakness was disclosed 06/27/2012 by Alex (Website). The advisory is shared at archives.neohapsis.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2012-3816 since 06/27/2012. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
A public exploit has been developed in Perl. The exploit is shared for download at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (75890), Exploit-DB (18945), SecurityFocus (BID 53702†), OSVDB (82488†) and Secunia (SA49299†). Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.8
VulDB Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Temp Score: 6.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
OpenVAS ID: 902918
OpenVAS Name: WinRadius Server Access Request Packet Parsing Denial of Service Vulnerability
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/28/2012 🔍05/29/2012 🔍
06/27/2012 🔍
06/27/2012 🔍
06/27/2012 🔍
03/23/2015 🔍
08/04/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comResearcher: Alex
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2012-3816 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2012-3816
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-61137
X-Force: 75890
SecurityFocus: 53702 - WinRadius Password Option Size Validation Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Secunia: 49299 - WinRadius Access-Request Packet Parsing Denial of Service Vulnerability, Less Critical
OSVDB: 82488
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 03/23/2015 16:50Updated: 08/04/2025 11:13
Changes: 03/23/2015 16:50 (61), 02/17/2019 11:01 (3), 08/04/2025 11:13 (20)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.