| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in CelFrame Office. This affects an unknown function in the library java_msci.dll. This manipulation causes untrusted search path. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2010-5207. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in CelFrame Office (the affected version is unknown) and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code in the library java_msci.dll. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a untrusted search path vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-426. The product searches for critical resources using an externally-supplied search path that can point to resources that are not under the product's direct control. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple untrusted search path vulnerabilities in CelFrame Office 2008 Standard Edition allow local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse (1) java_msci.dll or (2) msci_java.dll file in the current working directory, as demonstrated by a directory that contains a .doc, .xls, or .odg file. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
The weakness was shared 09/06/2012 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at secunia.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2010-5207 since 09/06/2012. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1574 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Secunia (SA41405†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Base Score: 8.4
VulDB Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Untrusted search pathCWE: CWE-426
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/06/2012 🔍09/06/2012 🔍
09/06/2012 🔍
03/23/2015 🔍
03/15/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: secunia.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2010-5207 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-5207
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-62059
Secunia: 41405
Entry
Created: 03/23/2015 16:50Updated: 03/15/2019 21:33
Changes: 03/23/2015 16:50 (45), 03/15/2019 21:33 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.