Neturf eCommerce Shopping Cart search.php SearchFor sql injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Neturf eCommerce Shopping Cart. It has been rated as critical. This affects an unknown part of the file search.php. The manipulation of the argument SearchFor leads to sql injection. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2011-5198. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Neturf eCommerce Shopping Cart (E-Commerce Management Software) (version unknown). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown function of the file search.php. The manipulation of the argument SearchFor with an unknown input leads to a sql injection vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-89. The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
SQL injection vulnerability in search.php in Neturf eCommerce Shopping Cart allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the SearchFor parameter. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
The weakness was published 09/23/2012 (Website). The advisory is shared at osvdb.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2011-5198 since 09/23/2012. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1505 for this issue.
It is declared as highly functional. By approaching the search of inurl:search.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (72037), OSVDB (78068†) and Secunia (SA47354†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Sql injectionCWE: CWE-89 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Highly functional
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/23/2012 🔍09/23/2012 🔍
09/23/2012 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
02/08/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: osvdb.org⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2011-5198 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2011-5198
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-62405
X-Force: 72037 - Neturf eCommerce search.php cross-site scripting
Secunia: 47354
OSVDB: 78068
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 12:22Updated: 02/08/2018 10:57
Changes: 03/24/2015 12:22 (49), 02/08/2018 10:57 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.