| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Rapidleech 2.3/Rev36. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file audl.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument links results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2011-5205. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Rapidleech 2.3/Rev36. It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown functionality of the file audl.php. The manipulation of the argument links with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in audl.php in Rapidleech 2.3 rev42 SVN r358, rev43 SVN r397, and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the links parameter.
The weakness was disclosed 10/04/2012 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2011-5205 since 10/04/2012. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
By approaching the search of inurl:audl.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (72071), SecurityFocus (BID 51215†) and Secunia (SA47434†). The entry VDB-62548 is pretty similar. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/30/2011 🔍01/02/2012 🔍
10/04/2012 🔍
10/04/2012 🔍
10/04/2012 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
02/22/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2011-5205 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2011-5205
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-62547
X-Force: 72071
SecurityFocus: 51215 - RapidLeech 'audl.php' Cross Site Scripting Vulnerability
Secunia: 47434 - Rapidleech Cross-Site Scripting and Script Insertion Vulnerabilities, Moderately Critical
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 12:22Updated: 02/22/2019 14:08
Changes: 03/24/2015 12:22 (50), 02/22/2019 14:08 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.